밀리터리 관련 사진을 올리는 게시판입니다.

한화70미리 다련장의 아버지??

yukim yukim 2969

2

9




    


profile image
폴라리스 2017.06.13. 01:38

소구경 MLRS는 역사가 오래되긴 했네요...

http://www.angelfire.com/art/enchanter/mrls.html

 

Lighter MRLs.
        As well as the medium systems described above, there is also a requirement for lighter systems that can either be towed by or mounted on light vehicles.
        Good examples of just such a system are the Russian RPU-14, the Chinese Type 63 107mm and 130mm systems and the South African Mechem RO107 systems. Such weapon systems are ideal for Airborne units, Quick Reaction and Rapid Deployment forces and Raider units.
        The South African version of the Type 63 is fitted with a UHF proximity fuse and 80% of rounds fired to maximum range are claimed to fall within a 150 x 200m area. Lethal area for each rocket given as 120 square metres. Each rocket weighs 19kg and maximum range for the Mechem rocket is given as 8,500m. Minimum range is 1.5km. Rockets made by some other companies claim a range in excess of 10km. Range of the 107mm rocket compliments the performance of most 120mm mortars. In the Chinese army launchers are under the control of Infantry regiments to provide a short-range, intensive area firepower. Several designs of single-tube launcher are also available for quasi-guerilla operations. It would not surprise me if a variant of this rocket that could be launched directly from its transport container in the manner of the Wurfgerät 40/41 is eventually developed.
        Light vehicles mounting such systems can give an air assault force a potent indirect fire capability to suppress enemy air defenses. The vehicles can be landed by helicopters, allowed to launch a barrage then heli-lifted out.
        The 2.75” FFAR rocket systems are normally used as aircraft armament but have great potential as ground weapons too. The 2.75” FFAR weighs around 13kg compared to the 18.8kg of the 107mm but has 4.8lbs of explosive content (M229) compared to 2.9lbs for the 107mm.
        Larry Altersitz:- A 2.75”/70mm has a 17lb HE warhead good to 10km and one pod would cover a big area. (19x17lb = 323lb of metal on a target. That's half a 155mm battery and 1½ of a 105mm battery). Six pods on a single launcher towed by a Hummer is almost a ton on a big area target and really says “Thou Goofest” to those in the area of interest.
        PW: Or looked at another way, a 155mm shell has 15lb of HE, a 105mm 5lb of HE and a 2.75” M229 rocket 4.8lb, so a pod of 19 rockets is equivalent to a salvo from a whole battery of 155mm or a three batteries of 105mm.
        A copy of Jane's Armour and Artillery 1994-95 reveals a number of 2.75”/70mm MRL systems in use or then available for production. These include:-
LAU97 Belgium*
AVIBRAS SBAT-70 Brazil
Bristol Aerospace CRV 7 Canada
IPTN NDL-40 Indonesia*
Hau Fah 1 & 3 Thailand
MKEK MAKSAM RA-7040 Turkey
BEI 70mm Rapid Deployment Multiple Rocket Weapon System (RD-MRWS) USA.
        *These systems use 70mm rockets other than the 2.75” Hydra 70 FFAR.
 
..
.
The SARMAC S.A “Rattlebox” was a Brandt-designed rocket system offered in the mid-1970's. It was a lightweight system intended “..in attack to support the infantry and in defence to break up the enemy attack. It can also be used to cover prepared obstacles with fire” (Jane's Infantry Weapons 1976, p.506). A simple 7-9 kg stand was used to mount expendable launch packs. The early model mounts three packs but later sources describe a 16 round weapon so evidently this was increased to four. The entire assembly weighed 30-40 kg and could be moved by two men with a light trolley. Each launch unit contained four 50mm x 550mm, 1.3 kg rockets. A launch unit was 140 x 140 x 600mm and weighed under 8 kg. The 12-16 rockets could all be launched in under a second and range is given as 800m. A variety of rocket types were proposed but the standard would probably have been the HEAT-Frag “combination” round. Shaped-charge warhead penetration is given as 250mm (same as the FIROS-6 HEDP rocket).
         Rattleback and FIROS-6 suggest that a battalion level system to supplement the infantry's mortars would be practical, being a useful saturation fire system against infantry in the open and light armoured and softskin vehicles such as technicals. Possibly a single Rattlebox could be deployed by a single soldier?
야드버드 2017.06.13. 08:23

70밀리 HYDRA 로켓의 지상발사형은 이미 오래전에  미국이  트럭이나 장갑차 탑재 및 경량의 견인식 발사대까지도 생각해봤습니다. 베트남에서 살짝 사용했는지는 모르겠네요. 또 ADATS같은 자주대공화기의 보조무장으로도 생각했었죠. 하지만  본격적인 실용화가 안되었죠.

profile image
yukim 글쓴이 2017.06.13. 09:03
종이호랭이티거

뭐 70미리정도면 도수장전이 진리아닐까요.

http://bemil.chosun.com/brd/files/BEMIL085/upload/2006/10/5_33.jpg

5_33.jpeg

 

profile image
Mr.AP 2017.06.18. 16:02
yukim

흠, 글쎄요. 인간의 열효율은 25% 선에 불과한데요.


에, 그냥 농담입니다.


말씀하신대로 크기나 차대의 여유 공간 및 탑재능력을 생각해보면… 아마 도수장전이 효율적이겠지요. 열효율만이 아니라 획득에 드는 가격이나 성능 등등을 크게 고려한다면요. 운용요원들은 힘들겠죠.

profile image
yukim 글쓴이 2017.06.18. 19:05
Mr.AP
가성비가 최고의 효율..(앗 예산전사..) 아닐까요
profile image
Mr.AP 2017.06.18. 19:16
yukim

예, 그렇지요. 동의합니다.

물늑대 2017.06.13. 13:49

현재 우리군이 채용한 것중 가장 가까운 무기체계라면 생긴 거로만은 구룡 이고, 로켓 구경의 유사성으로 본다면 비궁(LOGIR) 지상발사형이겠군요.

profile image
Mr.AP 2017.06.18. 15:56

허엇…


저는 한화의 70mm MLRS(천군이란 이름도 있더군요. 아마 업체 자체 명칭?)이 이런 부류의 소구경 다연장-혹은 70mm 로켓 다연장 체계에서 최초의 체계라곤 생각치는 않았지만… 인니의 NDL-40같은 선례가 있었으니까요.


헌데 이런 것까지 튀어나오니 많이 당황스럽습니다. 으허허허.

댓글 쓰기 권한이 없습니다. 로그인

취소 댓글 등록

신고

"님의 댓글"

이 댓글을 신고하시겠습니까?

댓글 삭제

"님의 댓글"

삭제하시겠습니까?

목록

밀리돔 | milidom 의 저작물은 다음의 사이트 이용 약관 에 의거해 이용 가능합니다.
이 라이선스의 범위 이외의 이용허락은 운영진에게 문의 하시기 바랍니다.