문서 자료를 올리는 게시판입니다.

Air-to-air missile non-comparison table

minki minki 254

0

0
Especially not range, for which the correct answer always is "it depends". 
[Range vs altitude/aspect] 
To take one example, the Vympel R-77 has a stated range of 100 km against a head-on target at high altitude, but only 25 km in a stern chase. At low altitude it can fire at head-on targets at 20 km, from which we can guess range in a stern chase is 5 km. (See the above diagram.) 
And this is presumably against targets that don't try to evade.

Range varies similarily for AIM-7C. 
 

Target and shooter both at M 0.9
altitude      head on                       tail chase
50.000'/16km  14.000-37.000 feet/4.5-12km   8.200-25.000 feet/3-8km
30.000'/10km   9.500-34.000 feet/3-11km     4.200-20.000 feet/1.6-6km
sea level      9.500-19.000 feet/3-6.5km    2.000- 5.700 feet/0.6-1.9km

The improvements planned for, but at the time of writing (2000) cancelled, future versions of AMRAAM include the ability to engage 9G manouevring targets at 30 km, which will let it engage non-agile targets at more than 60 km, which gives a good idea of the range difference depending on type of target.

This is what the Swedish air force says are typical ranges for some missiles

                   Low altitude    High altitude
Rb 24J Sidewinder  about 1000 m    slightly more than 3000 m (AIM-9P)
Rb 71 SkyFlash     a couple of km  well over 10 km
Rb 74 Sidewinder, AIM-9L
   Can be fired at even shorter ranges and more extreme angles than
   AIM-9J, as well as handle even more agile targets.
Not quite as impressive as some of the numbers usually given, but these are ranges usable in practice, most of the time.

Also, range and speed aren't everything when it comes to missile performance. For example, the AIM-7E and -7E Sparrow missiles had a higher allowed G loading during launch than the concurrent AIM-9E Sidewinder, which may have been a factor why they were used otherwise surprisingly often.

The R-3S were limited to launch at less then 2G up to an altitude 15 km and 1.6G over that, the AIM-9B/D 2-2.5G. Presumably almost the same goes for the AIM-9E, but the AIM-9J introduced in 1972 allowed the launching aircraft to turn at up to 7G.

The AIM-9E and -9J Sidewinders both had a rocket motor impulse of 8,800 lb/s, burn time of 2.2 s, peak thrust of 4,200 lb, giving an acceleration of 28G. But there are interesting differences as well:

        Seeker   Seeker  Servo   Torque   Guidance  Lateral G 
        track    cage    torque  feedback duration  capability one plane 
        rate     rate            servo              sea level/16 km

AIM-9B                                              10/4 G (?)
AIM-9E  12       10      750lb-in No      20 s      11/6 G
AIM-9J  16       16     1050lb-in Yes     40 s      22/13 G 
        deg/s    deg/s/deg
Does this mean the AIM-9J was better at everything than the AIM-9E?
The above was intended to give it both a shorter minimum engagement range and larger max range at high altitude. For targets with large aspect angeles it really was much better, but the torque feedback servo caused overcontrolling for targets with small aspect angles, resulting in excessive manoeuvring = more drag and shorter range.

The AIM-9B had a rather small envelope at low altitude and fast targets: For a shot straight from behind, both aircraft flying at M0.8 at sea level the minimum range was 3000 foot, max range 4000 foot in straight and level flight. If the target was turning at 3G it was 3250 and 3750 foot, if it was turning at 5G there wasn't any envelope at all.

A usenet article: Re: US AAMs 0-for-6 - about AAM hit statistics.


Maker       Guidance   Speed,Mach   Length/diam./span,cm
Designation       Min/max,km  Weight,kg

CHINA
CATIC                                           PL, Pi Li = Thunderbolt
PL-2        IR    /3    ?      76   299/13/53   licence built R-13
PL-3        IR    /3    ?      82   299/13/53   larger PL-2
PL-4        SAR   /8    ?      93   350/13/53   PL-2/3 variant
PL-5B       IR    /3    ?      85   289/13/85   AIM-9G lookalike
PL-5E       IR   .5/14  ?      85   289/13/85   Export variant with all aspect
          seeker, +-25 deg before launch, +-40 after. 40G lateral capability.
PL-7        IR    /3    ?      90   275/16/66   Magic lookalike
PL-8        IR    /5    ?     120   300/16/86   Python 3 lookalike
PL-9        IR    /5    ?     120   300/16/81   Larger PL-5, not in service
PL-10       SAR   /15   3     300   400/29/117  Variant of HQ-61 SAM, AIM-7E copy, cancelled?
PL-11       SAR  0.5/35 4     220   370/20/100  Aspide Mk 1
LY-60(N)    SAR  0.5/35 4     220   370/20/100  Based on Aspide

FRANCE
Matra
R.511       SAR   /10   ?     180   310/26/100
R.530     IR/SAR  /18   ?     195   328/26/110
Super 530D  SAR   /40   4.5   270   380/26/62
Super 530F  SAR  0.5/25 4.5   245   350/26/88
R.550 Magic IR  0.3/3+  2+     89   272/16/66
Magic 2     IR  0.3/5+  2+     90   275/16/66

Matra-BAE Systems Dynamics
MICA        AR/IR <0.5/>50 3+ 110  310/16/56
   Has four "firing modes" (exactly what is meant?): Long and 
   medium range with INS, datalink and terminal homing; close 
   range and self defence. Lock-on after launch or lock-on before launch.
   Radar IOC 1997, IR IOC 1999, by 2006 3000 produced.

GERMANY
X-4      CLOS           0.9    60   201/22/58

EURAAM is a German backup project to UK's BVRAAM requirement,
in case a missile Germany doesn't want is choosen. It's sort of a follow 
on to the A3M project. Has a Ka band active and X band passive
seeker (which could also be adopted on a possible German Meteor version(?)).

INDIA
Astra       AR   /25          148   380/25/??
   under development, intended for LCA, configured
   "like a long Matra 530", narrower in front of the
   wings, 15 kg warhead, supposed to be test flown in
   1999, first flight (ground launched) in 2003.


ISRAEL
Rafael
Shafrir                                        IOC 1963
Shafrir 2   IR    /3    ?      93   260/16/64  IOC 1969
          30 deg off boresight launch capability at a 4G
          manouvering target at 30000'. Uncooled seeker.
Python 3    IR   0.5/5  3.5   120   300/16/86  IOC 1978
Python 4    IR    /18   ?     106   300/16/50  IOC 1993
Rafael: Python 4
LM: Python 4
     More on Python 4
[Configuration]Turns 180 deg in 3 s, 80 kN thrust for 3 s, 0.7 kN for a further 80 s, dual canards, two narrow ailerons 45 deg offset behind the second set of canards, rear fins leading edge root extensions to mid fuselage for strengthening. Stabilised two colour 60 deg off boresight seeker. 
Python 5    IR   /20   4      106   300/16/50  IOC 2003
   Same airframe, warhead, proximity fuze and motor as Python 4,
   two colour focal plane array seeker, upgraded INS and autopilot/flight
   control laws. "Full sphere capability". Seeker may be a derivative of
   the cancelled AIM-9R's seeker.
Derby       AR    /?    ?     118   380/16/50   In service since around 1991.
[Derby has the same ailerons behind the front, single, control surfaces as Python 4]Also called Alto. Shares a lot with Python 4 and is pylon compatible with it. Radar seeker by IAI. Can be used for short- and medium range, look and shoot down. Lock on before or after launch modes. 
ITALY
Alenia
Aspide Mk1  SAR  0.5/35 4     220   370/20/100
     Looks like a Sparrow, but no common components.
Aspide Mk2  AR    /50   4     230   365/21/100    Development on hold

JAPAN
AAM-1                                           Licence built AIM-9E Sidewinder
Mitsubishi
AAM-3     IR/AR   /5           70   260/ /      
[dog tooth on control surfaces]Type 90, Sidewinder derivative with higher scan rate than AIM-9L 
AAM-4       AR                                  Development funded
AAM-5 New short range missile, flight tests of XAAM-5 on F-15J starts
    in 2001, it's a dogfight missile with longer lockon range (than AAM-3),
    higher off boresight capability, better IRCCM and longer range.
    Will have thrust vectoring. Expected in service date is 2004.
                   
RUSSIA

Vihkr 9A220  AAM version of the AT-12 anti-armour
             helicopter carried missile.

OKB-2, Grushin/Tomashevitch
RS-1U                                           Also K-5  "AA-1 Alkali"
RS-2US      BR 1.95/5.2 ?      84   250/20/195  Also K-51 "AA-1 Alkali"

Mikoyan-Gurevich
K-9 / K-155 Shown with MiG E-152A, never in service, "AA-4 Awl"

Sukhoi
PR-38       Intended for T-37 and P-37, cancelled

OKB-134, Torpov, Lyapin, Vympel
K-7L        BR    2/5   ?     150   357/22/81   All K-7s were cancelled
K-7S        Self-homing variant                 in favour of K-8
K-7SZ       Tailless
K-75        SAR   /4    ?      82   249/20/57
R-3S        IR  1.2/7.6 2.5    75   283/13/53   Also K-13A "AA-2 Atoll"
                                                Sidewinder AIM-9B copy
R-3R        SAR     1/7 2.5    84   342/13/53   Also K-13R "AA-2 Atoll-C"
R-13M       IR   0.6/15 2.5    90   288/13/59   "AA-2 Atoll-D"
K-14                 Sidewinder AIM-9L copy, cancelled in favour of K-73/R-73
K-88        IR   1/13   ?     110     /20/      K-8 with K-13 seeker, cancelled

OKB-4, Bisnovat, Molniya
SNARS-250 SAR/IR  /5    ?     285   420/ /108
K-8       SAR/IR 2/12   ?     275     /28/      Never entered service
R-8M                                            Also K-8M "AA-3 Anab"
R-8M2                                           redesignated R-98
R-98RM      SAR  1.9/18 2+    292   427/28/130  "AA-3 Anab"
R-98TM      IR   1.9/18 2+    227   400/28/130  "AA-3 Anab"
R-4R        SAR  4/20   ?     550   550/32/150  Also K-80 "AA-5 Ash"
R-4T        IR                                  "AA-5 Ash"
R-4TM /RM                                       Also K-80M "AA-5 Ash"
R-40RD      SAR   /70   4.5   461   622/31/145  "AA-6 Acrid" "D" means improved
R-40TD      IR    /30   4.5   460   620/31/145  as they were compromised in -76
R-60        IR    /5    2.5    44   209/12/39   "AA-8 Aphid"
R-60MK      IR   0.5/12 2.5    45   214/12/39   Export version
R-23R       SAR   1.8/33 2.5  223   446/20/100  "AA-7 Apex"
R-23T       IR    1.8/33 2.5  217   416/20/100
R-24R,R-24T improved R-23 versions
R-24R       SAR   /50   ?     250   480/20/97   "AA-7 Apex"
R-27R       SAR   0.5/50  2.5 253   408/23/77   "AA-10 Alamo A"
R-27T       IR    0.5/18  2.5 245   380/23/77   "AA-10 Alamo B"
R-27RE      SAR   0.5/130 ?   350   478/26/80   "AA-10 Alamo C"
R-27TE      IR    0.5/70  ?   350   480/26/97   "AA-10 Alamo D"
R-27P   anti-radar
R-27AE      AR    0.5/80  ?   350   480/26/97   not in service
R-27ME      SAR   0.5/170 ?   350   480/26/97   not in service?
  The R-27 missiles have claimed target altitude capability of
  between 24km (R-27T1) and 30km (R-27ET1)
R-33        SAR   /120    ?   490   415/38/118  "AA-9 Amos"
R-37        AR    /300    ?   600   400/30/100
 "Improved" R-33, not in service. Fixed forward canards, four folding rear fins
R-77        AR 0.5/90  3     175   360/20/70   RVV-AE  "AA-12 Adder"
 The maker doesn't like calling it "R-77". Also known as AAM-AE.
 In production since late 1997 (but interupted due to move to
 other production facilities). (It's been hinted that "R-77" 
 may refer to a different, SARH, missile, earlier than RVV-AE.)
 As of 2003 does not have lofted trajectory capability,
 that, and a new motor, is worked on (R-77M?).
R-77M       AR    1/90  3     175       20/70
 Longer, heavier, due to dual boost motor. Improved warhead. 
 Announced as a "mid-life update" in 1998.
            AR     Hybrid rocket/ramjet, not ordered, RVV-AE-PD

Molniya/Vympel
R-73        IR    0.4/15 3    105   290/18/51   "AA-11 Archer"
   8 year shelf life, 40 hour life carried on pylon. Lacks a self destruct timer.
R-73E RDM1  IR    0.3/30 3+   110   290/18/51   +-75 deg field of regard, limited
   Can intercept 12G targets at 0.3-30 km       to +-60 when cued by +-60 deg radar 
   or turn 180 deg        Can be set to not track targets off more than +- 4 deg
                          from the HMS cueing, before launch
R-73M RDM2  IR       /40 ?                      +-60 deg before launch +-90 after


Novator
Ks-172      AR    /400   ?    750   740/51/  1.4m booster, AAM-L, Not funded

Zvezda
K-55        IR 1.2/10   ?      91               Modified K-5
Kh-37 Anti-radar />100  ?           470/36/
                       
SOUTH AFRICA
Denel
Kukri V-3B  IR   0.3-4  2.5    73   294/13/53
Kentron
Darter V-3C IR   0.3-10 2      89   275/16/66   Uses "twist-and-turn"
   control, with one set of fixed forward fins and offset 90 deg to them
   tandem control surfaces like Magic, which it is otherwise similar too. 
   Turns up to 35G.
U-Darter    IR   0.3-10? 2?    89?  275/16/66   Like Darter, but with
   cruciform tandem control surfaces. Turns at 55G, off boresight
   capability up to 56 deg. In service (1997)
A-Darter   IIR                                  
   Reported to have a peak manoeuvrability of 100G.
[A-Darter]The A-Darter uses both tail control and thrust vectoring. Full scale development has not begun (1997). Guided flight tests to start (1999).
V4  R-Darter  AR               Entered service 
   around 1995, has at least two launch modes with lock on before
   or after launch. Probably shares some technology with Derby.
S-Darter/LRAAM                 ramjet powered, in development
T-Darter    AR    /50+         Air breathing, mid-course datalink.
                               Probably an SAHV-3 development. 
                               Offered to Pakistan (1999).
SWEDEN
Saab 324    IR     ?     ?     70   282/13/56 Rb 24  Licence produced Sidewinder
            IR     ?     ?     82   307/13/56 Rb 24J Licence produced Sidewinder
            Saab built AIM-9P3 /P5 used on Austrian Drakens
Saab 327    SAR   /16    ?     90   213/28/61 Rb 27  Hughes HM 55 Falcon licence
            produced by Saab/Bofors, similar or equivalent to 
            AIM-26B, used on Drakens, and Swiss Mirage IIIs
Saab 328    IR    /9     3     54   198/16/51 Rb 28  Hughes HM 58 Falcon licence
            produced by Saab/Bofors, more or less an AIM-4C with AIM-4D seeker,
            used on Drakens, and Swiss Mirage IIIs. 
Saab 372    Cancelled 1970's project, short range agile IIR
Saab 373    Cancelled 1970's project. Very long range (100km+) active radar,
     one variant similar to a tail controlled (no wings) SkyFlash

TAIWAN
Chung Shan Institute
Tien Chien I IR   /5     ?     90   287/13/64   Sky Sword I, Sidewinder-like
Tien Chien II SAR? /35   ?    190   360/20/75   Sparrow-like, may be AR
     Reported as having been improved to give a range of 90 km
     Two VL SAM derivative versions during development (1999)

UNITED KINGDOM
de Havilland
Firestreak  IR    1.2/8  3    136   319/22/75   
Red Top     IR    1.2/11 3+   150   327/23/91   First (1964) all-aspect IR missile 

Hawker Siddeley Dynamics
Taildog


British Aerospace
Sky Flash   SAR   0.5/50 4    192   366/20/102 
      Motor and warhead (30kg continous rod) as AIM-7E, but seeker (mono pulse)
      small enough to fit in AIM-7F anyway. IOC 1978.
      Can be launched with a warm up of only 1-2s.
      Can be launched at 100 m altitude towards higher
      targets, from high altitude to targets flying at 75 m.

BAe/Thomson-CSF
Active Sky Flash AR /50  4    208   366/20/102  Not funded, cancelled

BAe/Raytheon Defense Systems (Hughes)
AIM-132     IIR   0.3/10 2+    87   290/17/45  ASRAAM +-90 deg field of regard
       128x128 staring focal plane imaging array. Has lock after
       launch and memory tracking ability. Laser gyros and solid state
       accelerometers. Lateral acceleration 60+ G at sea level.
BAE Systems Australia, FAS, ASRAAM

Shorts Missile Systems
Air to Air Starstreak  ?  ?     ?    ?   Three laser beam riding darts, time of flight to 4 km 5 s

INTERNATIONAL
Germany (46%), Italy (19%), Sweden (18%), Greece (13%), Canada and Norway.
The Dutch, Belgian and Danish air forces has also shown interest.
Service entry in 2002.
BGT/SAAB/AleniaMarconi are the main contractors
IRIS-T      IIR                      
[Configuration]Thrust vectoring, under development, 90 deg off boresight seeker, 64x64 (scanning?) indium-antimonide 3-5 micron seeker. Sidewinder interoperable. Capable of 60G turns and 60deg AoA. Active radar fuze, 9kg warhead. [Configuration]The earlier configuration. Links: [1] [2] [3] [4] 
Matra BAE System Dynamics/Saab-Bofors Dynamics/Alenia Marconi Systems/LFK/CASA/Thomson-CSF/Bayern Chemie/Boeing
Meteor      AR    />100  ?    160?  300/20/56?   
   Meteor
[Configuration]Solid fuel variable flow rocket ramjet for high terminal velocity at long range. [Configuration]Has superceded the A3M and S225X projects for the BVRAAM requirement.Configuration changed 1998 to include four mid fuselage wings, as of early 2000 only two mid fuselage wings. In 2003 it changed again to no wings, bank and turn at long range, skid turn for the terminal engagement. Guidance is ISN, two-way datalink and active Ku band radar seeker. Can receive targeting data after launch from the launching fighter, another fighter, AWACs or Erieye aircraft. 
First test launch in 2005, from a Gripen. Eurofighter and Rafale to follow. 
USA
Teledyne Ryan
MALI  CC+terminal /460+? ?    160?  365?/ /
   Miniature Air Launched cruise missile Interceptor.
   Derivative of the MALD decoy, which has a 20 min endurance
   and 460+ km range, MALI will have same engine and fuel amount (9kg). 
   Attack speed will be subsonic, but supersonic dash with swept wings possible.
   Preliminary flight tests will be concluded by 2001, final development not
   decided. (Other derivatives is one autonomous attack and one defence suppression.)

Hughes
AIM-4       SAR   /8    <3      54?  198/16/51?  ex GAR-1 anti-bomber, contact fuze only, 3.4 kg warhead
AIM-4A      SAR   /9     3     54   198/16/51   Falcon, ex GAR-1D, anti-bomber
   Larger, separate from the fins, control surfaces for better manoeuverability.
AIM-4B      IR    /9    <3      54?  198/15/51?  ex GAR-2, as GAR-1D, but IR.
AIM-4C      IR    /9     3     54   198/16/51   Falcon, more sensitive seeker, anti-bomber, ex GAR-2A
AIM-4D      IR    /9     3     54   198/16/51   Falcon, only anti-fighter. ex GAR-2B. Super Falcon seeker, high impulse motor
AIM-4E      SAR   /11    ?     68   218/16/61   Super Falcon. ex GAR-3  longer burning motor
AIM-4F      SAR   /11    4     68   218/17/61   Super Falcon  ex GAR-3A  dual thrust motor introduced, proximity fuze introduced, improved seeker
AIM-4G      IR    /11    4     68   206/17/61   Super Falcon  ex GAR-4A  as GAR-3A but improved IR , possibly 13kg warhead.
AIM-4H      dogfighting version, would if built have had a laser fuze and larger warhead than AIM-4D
AIM-26A     SAR   /8-16  2     90   213/28/61   Falcon, 0.25kT nuclear W54. ex GAR-11
AIM-26B     SAR   /8-16  2     90   213/28/61   Falcon, high-explosive. ex GAR-11A
AIM-47A   SAR/IR  /160   6    363   320/33/84   ex-GAR-9, for YF-12
            storable liquid fuel motor, 35 kg W-42 nuclear warhead
Raytheon Defense Systems (Hughes)
AIM-120A    AR    0.5/50 4    157   365/18/53   AMRAAM non-reprogrammable (without hardware change)
   USAF AMRAAM factsheet
   USN AMRAAM factsheet
   AMRAAM
AIM-120B    as AIM-120A, with electronics upgrade including new processor and EEPROMs, reprogrammable in the field.
AIM-120C    AR    0.5/50 4    157   365/18/45   Smaller span for internal carriage, reprogrammable ECCM. The USAF
    All-Up-Round (AUR) container houses an internal cable which enables up to four missiles to be reprogrammed while 
    in the container. USN containers are not equipped with the cable and must be opened to reprogram the missile.
    Can be noted that kinematic range if launched at M1.5 is 50% greater than if launched at M0.9.
AIM-120C4 /C5   AR    0.5/50 4    157   365/18/45   Longer motor/shorter control section, new 10% smaller warhead
   A "Passive adjunct seeker" was demonstrated in 1998, will home on 
   emitted radar signals and revert to active radar if necessary.
   Look angle increased from +-25 deg to +-70 deg (or perhaps from B or C)
AIM-120C-6  Improved fuse
AIM-120C-7  Improved homing algorithm and thus greater range
AIM-120D    GPS-aided INS, conformal front antenna, 50% greater range than C-7,
            suitable for electronic attack environment, first flight test 2008
AIM-120 P3I P3    planned (around 2000), larger motor like ERAAM
AIM-120 P3I P4    planned (around 2000) for production in 2010, gel fuel, possibly thrust vectoring (a la Dual Range AAM)

AIM-54C     AR   4/200   4    463   430/38/92   Phoenix
ASRAAM P3I   Like an AIM-132, but with thrust vectoring, 
             larger warhead, shorter range, AIM-9X contender, not chosen.
FMRAAM is a (possibly incremental)
AMRAAM follow on for UK's BVRAAM requirement. ERAAM would be an AMRAAM with
larger dual pulse motor and smaller tail fins and upgraded guidance (2005),
FMRAAM would give it a rocket ramjet motor (2007).


XAIM-95 Agile
AIM-155 AAAM      /270   4    300     ?/23/?
ACIMD

Raytheon    
Box Office 2 IR   ?      ?      ?     ?/13/28    
[Configuration]256x256 rotate-to-view imaging seeker, with 120 deg off boresight view, AIM-9X contender, not chosen. Achived 30 g for 2 s and 25 g for 2 s, max alpha 27 deg. Turned at 100 deg/s with thrust vectoring. Max alpha 60+ deg at 300 m/s, turn radius of 200 m, turned 180 deg in 2.5 s. 
BoxOffice 3       Larger diameter AIM-9X contender, not chosen.

Raytheon Defense Systems (/General Dynamics/Hughes)
AIM-7A      beam riding   Sparrow 1 (1946, IOC 1956)
            35kN motor thrust for 1.8 s. Designition given after taken out of service.
AIM-7B      AR            Sparrow 2 (1955- cancelled 1958, application would have been CF-105)
AIM-7C      SAR           Sparrow 3 (1955, IOC 1959)
            Designed for short rail launch at up to transsonic speeds (M1.3).
            Autopilot limits lateral G to 15. 
            Can track 3^2m target at 16000 yards, 10^2m target at 24000 yards.
            Compares reflected radar signal with direct from illuminator to
            obtain target closing range, ECCM includes a speed gate.
            Same motor as AIM-7A.
AIM-7D      SAR            
            Designed for ejector launch at up to M2.2: Tougher electronics
            and a bit smarter autopilot. Also said to be able to take on
            targets with faster closing rate (all aspect, maybe C wasn't).
            Storable liquid fuel motor with impulse of 15000lb/s for 1.9s.
AIM-7E      SAR   /25    ?    205   366/20/102 (IOC 1962)
            Motor burn 2.8 s (solid fuel, also given as 22100lb/s for 2.9s)
            30 kg continous rod warhead
            Has three different control surface gains depending on launch altitude,
            larger rudder movements higher up (which means best range against high
            flying targets can be achieved by firing up at them).
AIM-7E2     Introduces a really short range (0.6km?), "dog-fight" capability,
            by having smaller wings and modified fuze.
            Also probably faster arming after launch.
AIM-7F      SAR   /40    ?    227   366/20/102  Sparrow
            Introduces boost/sustain motor, seeker compatible
            with pulse-doppler radars. Accelerates to M 2.5 in 2.7 s.
            Titanium (=thinner) wings for better range and solid state
            electronics for better reliability. The smaller electronic
            package also enabled the warhead to be placed in front of the
            wings, allowing for a larger motor. Pre-launch warmup <2s.
            39 kg continous rod warhead.  (1970, IOC 1975)
AIM-7M      SAR   0.6/45 2.5  230   366/20/102  (1976, IOC 1980)
            Inverse monopulse seeker, digital control, 
            39 kg directed blast/fragmentation warhead, built in
            flight test during launch sequence
AIM-7P      CC+SAR /45   2.5  230   366/20/102  (1987, IOC 1992)
AIM-7R      CC+SAR+IR for terminal attack       (1988, cancelled)
            Small AIM-9 seeker in centre of nose cone.
USAF factsheet

US Naval Weapons Center/Ford/Hughes/Raytheon Defense Systems
AIM-9A                                                     Prototype in 1953
AIM-9B      IR    /3     ?     70   282/13/56 Sidewinder   IOC 1956  
    +-25 deg field of regard, 11 deg/s tracking. Uncooled Pbs. Scanning at 70Hz, could not look 
    closer than 20 (later 5) degrees to the sun. 4.5 kg warhead. Passive IR fuze. 
    Lateral acceleration 10 G at sea level, 4 G (?) at 16 km.
AIM-9C      SAR   /18    ?     84   287/13/64 Remade into Sidearm anti-radar m.
AIM-9D      IR    /18    ?     88   287/13/64 40 deg look, 12 deg/s track, 125Hz scanning, 
    N2 cooled PbS. magnesium flouride dome. 10.2 kg warhead.
AIM-9E      IR    /4     ?     74   300/13/56 40 deg look, 16.5 deg/s tracking, 100Hz scanning
    peltier cool PbS, 4.5 kg warhead  IOC 1967
    Lateral acceleration 11 G at sea level, 6 G at 16 km.
AIM-9E-2    Reduced smoke motor
AIM-9F      AIM-9B-FGW.2  BGT upgrade, silicon dome, CO2 cooled seeker and not just tube electronics
AIM-9G      IR    /18    ?     88   287/13/64 As D + Expanded Acquisition Mode
AIM-9H      IR    /18    ?     86   287/13/64 As G w/solid state, 20 deg/s track,
    off boresight lockon and launch, lead bias (hit front of target)  IOC 1973
AIM-9I      A Diehl BGT upgrade of L with better IRCCM.
            In service no later than 1997 (1), by 2006 AIM-9L/I was the most modern Sidewinder on Swedish Gripens (2).
AIM-9J      IR    /8    2.5    78   307/13/56 As E w/part solid state. IOC 1977 (but used in 1972)
    Lateral acceleration 22 G at sea level, 13 G at 16 km.
AIM-9JULI                                     AIM-9J with seeker from L
AIM-9K      More agile missile concept, USN work started in 1970, never fielded.
AIM-9L      IR   0.5/18 2.5    87   287/13/64 +-67 deg look, All-asp. Ar c. InSb. 9.4 kg warhead, 
    laser fuze w/ 10 m detonation distance. FM-AM conical scan.
    +-27 deg field of regard before launch. 32G lateral acceleration.   IOC 1978
AIM-9M      IR   0.5/18 2.5    88   287/13/64 As L w/reduced smoke+better ECCM   IOC 1983
                 750 m turn radius, optimum alpha 10 deg. 35G lateral acceleration capability.
    AIM-9M-7   Specific modification for Gulf war zone expected threats 
    (Before or after the war itself? One could be to counter modern fighters, the other the
    unexpectedly quick Russian flares.)
    AIM-9M-8       USN
    AIM-9M-9       USAF
AIM-9N      IR    /8    2.5    78   307/13/56 As E w/part solid state
AIM-9P      IR    /8    2.5    82   307/13/56 As N +reliability improvements. Export model. (IOC 1978) 
    AIM-9P1: Active laser fuze.
    AIM-9P2: Reduced smoke motor. 
    AIM-9P3: Stronger fuselage, better guidance, less sensitive explosive in the warhead.
    AIM-9P4: All aspect target homing.
    AIM-9P5: Improved ECCM
AIM-9Q      As L w/ improved guidance section
AIM-9R      optical, daylight only, three colour imaging seeker. Cancelled
AIM-9S      IR   0.5/18 2.5    88   287/13/64 As M w/larger warhead (and deleted ECCM for export?)
AIM-9X      IIR   ?     2.5?   85    302/13/48 Evolved Sidewinder
AIM-9X Block 2    Improved guidance and fuze. Data link to enable lock on after launch. Tests start in 2008.
[Configuration]Raytheon will build the Evolved Sidewinder. 128x128 staring focal plane array, 3-5 micron. It has thrust vectoring, will use existing Sidewinder motors. Fins and rudders are smaller. Block 2 has same datalink as AMRAAM for lock on after launch mode. 
The Sidewinder Story
Raytheon (Philco/General Electric) AAM-N-7/GAR-8/AIM-9 Sidewinder
AIM-9 Sidewinder - Wikipedia
AIM-9 Sidewinder Air-to-Air Missile

Raytheon Defense Systems (General Dynamics)
FIM-92      IR    0.3/4 1.8    15   152/7/9     Stinger

McDonnell Douglas Astronautics
AIR-2A  unguided /9      ?    372   274/43/61   Genie, nuclear warhead
신고
0




    


댓글 쓰기 권한이 없습니다. 로그인

취소 댓글 등록

신고

"님의 댓글"

이 댓글을 신고하시겠습니까?

댓글 삭제

"님의 댓글"

삭제하시겠습니까?

목록

밀리돔 | milidom 의 저작물은 다음의 사이트 이용 약관 에 의거해 이용 가능합니다.
이 라이선스의 범위 이외의 이용허락은 운영진에게 문의 하시기 바랍니다.